The reported creation of a mutant coronavirus strain with a 100% kill rate in mice, particularly one that attacks the brain, is indeed concerning. Alina Chan, a molecular biologist, rightly emphasizes the potential dangers associated with such experiments, especially if there is a risk of accidental release from the laboratory.
The issue of self-regulation by scientists in conducting these experiments raises questions about oversight and accountability. Given the potentially catastrophic consequences of a leak or accidental release of such a highly lethal virus, there is a valid argument for stricter regulations and oversight mechanisms.
Implementing location sequestering for laboratories conducting experiments with highly dangerous pathogens could be a viable solution to mitigate the risks associated with accidental release. This would involve locating such laboratories in remote or isolated areas away from densely populated cities, reducing the likelihood of exposure to the surrounding population in the event of a containment breach.
Ensuring proper safety protocols, rigorous containment measures, and stringent oversight by regulatory bodies are essential to prevent any potential disasters stemming from experiments with deadly pathogens. The priority must always be to balance scientific advancement with the safety and well-being of the global population.
Of note, the pandemic virus also caused 100 percent of humanized mice to die.
This story was broken by The Hill’s Rising.
